VEHA

VEHA

Guidance

Virtual Environmental and Humanitarian Adviser Tool – (VEHA Tool) is a tool
to easily integrate environmental considerations in humanitarian response. Field Implementation guidances are useful for the design and execution of humanitarian activities in the field.

back to activity

VEHA - Field Implementation Guidance

Welcome
Shelter
Technical assistance –Transitional shelter and core housing
General construction activities
Excavation activities

Shelter – Excavation activities

Context

Overview
Environmental factors causing/contributing to the needs and affecting the humanitarian activity

Sudden or progressive changes in the local environment often adversely affect the lives or living conditions of people. These people may then be forced to leave their homes. When environmental degradation occurs or natural hazards rapidly impact vulnerable areas, People may be forced to move. Relocation areas require proper infrastructure. This requires land clearance and construction activities to be undertaken in a way that does not over compact soil. Poor excavation pollutes the air and watercourses and can spread hazardous substances that may affect the health of humans, flora, and fauna, and can damage sensitive ecosystems and breeding grounds.

Implications
Gender, age, disability and HIV/AIDS implications

Marginalised people are often impacted by construction activities, sometimes forcing them to relocate without any consultation. Vulnerable or minority people should always be consulted and their needs accommodated within the response design.

Impacts

Environmental impact categories

Air pollution
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Deforestation
Desertification
Loss of biodiversity and ecosystems
Natural Resource depletion
Soil erosion

Summary of Impacts
Summary of potential environmental impacts

1. Soil loss

2. Air, water, soil pollution

3. Loss of water resources

4. Damage to fragile ecosystems

5. Health and safety hazards, soil loss, and disease spread from open trenches

6. Soil loss and disease spread from piled excavated soil

Impact detail
Detailed potential environmental impact information

1. Soil excavation for shelter sites can cause soil loss through excess removal of vegetation or ground surface reprofiling, both of which can lead to floods, and water or wind erosion of soil and / or degrading of soil quality

2. Excavation activities can pollute air, water or soil by uncovering toxins or pollutants already within a site or importing them in the construction materials used or crisis waste redistributed on a site

3. Excavation activities can block or divert water courses or divert surface water causing excess soil erosion and deposition within water courses. Poorly managed excavation activities can lead to the partial or total loss of water resources if surface water infiltration is reduced or water courses diverted away from the site

4. Fragile ecosystems can easily be damaged by construction activities through removing flora or fauna that other species rely on, interrupting food chains, disrupting water courses or drainage pathways, or introducing pollutants (e.g. diesel spills, cement slurry) or pathogens that spread disease amongst flora and fauna

5. Open trenches create hazards to adults, children, animals and vehicles, who may fall into them. They can also lead to soil loss from water flow and disease spread if they harbour stagnant water

6. Soil loss and disease spread can also ensue from uncovered piled excavated soil that is left on site for excessive periods

Guidance

Summary
Summary of environmental activities

1. Minimise soil excavation

2a. Re-use excavated soil on-site wherever possible

2b. Assess crisis or construction waste and imported materials for contaminants

3. Map and protect watercourses

4. Map and protect fragile ecosystems

5. Rebury excavated trenches within 4 days

6. Manage re-use of excavated soil to avoid excessive runoff or hosting disease vectors

Detail
Detailed guidance for implementing suggested environmental activities

1. Minimise soil excavation. This can be done by planning shelter sites within existing ground profiles and contours, noting and avoiding watercourses and natural drainage channels and sensitive ecosystems, and minimising vegetation removal. Alternative construction methods can be used that minimise excavation, such as raft foundations or the use of short piles for buildings.

2a. Always plan to re-use any excavated soil on-site wherever possible, as long as this can be done without harming any fragile ecosystems on the site.

2b. Assess any re-used crisis or construction waste and any imported materials for potential contaminants and ensure contaminants identified are suitably removed and safely disposed of

3. Map watercourses and ensure new structures and infrastructure do not divert them or cause excess surface water run-off to enter them

4. Map the presence of any fragile ecosystems and their specific fragilities and put measures in place to protect them from construction activities

5. Excavated trenches should be reburied quickly (maximum 4 days open) to avoid hosting vectors or accidents within the affected communities

6. Excavated soil must be managed or disposed of to avoid excessive runoff or turning into a potential host for disease vectors. The soil should be re-used locally if possible, or transported to an off-site for another re-use (e.g. construction or landfill cover).

Lessons Learnt
Lessons from past experiences

CASE STUDY: ACEH, INDONESIA POST-TSUNAMI HOUSING PROJECT

Houses in Aceh Besar District, Sumatra, Indonesia, were built after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, as well as a newly constructed seawall that was built as a coastal barrier to protect residents from future tsunamis and storms surges. Unfortunately, the site plan and design for the housing project overlooked the fact that a significant quantity of freshwater flows from inland areas toward the ocean during periods of heavy rainfall and becomes trapped by the seawall before it is released into the ocean.

The recurring floods damaged the newly constructed shelter, water and sanitation systems, and roads, and have affected residents’ health and quality of life. As a short-term fix, a costly drainage system was installed. To prevent these types of problems and added costs in the future, project planners need to ensure that there is coordinated planning among a range of stakeholders beyond the immediate project area and must pay particular attention to the broader environmental context.

FROM: https://www.sheltercluster.org/sites/default/files/docs/GRRT%204%20-%20Strategic%20Site%20Selection%20and%20Development.pdf

Activity Measurement
Environmental indicators/monitoring examples

Percentage decrease in volume of excavated soil

Priority
Activity Status
Medium
Main Focus
Focus of suggested activities

Prevention of environmental damage

Mitigation of environmental damage

Implications
Resource implications (physical assets, time, effort)

Time for assessing ground conditions, and planning construction methods to reduce or avoid excavation

Back
to top
icon-menu icon-close icon-account icon-arrow icon-down icon-back icon-pointed-arrow icon-left icon-up icon-bookmark icon-share twitter facebook2 printer envelope icon-close-alt icon-top icon-loading icons / login