VEHA

VEHA

Guidance

Virtual Environmental and Humanitarian Adviser Tool – (VEHA Tool) is a tool
to easily integrate environmental considerations in humanitarian response. Field Implementation guidances are useful for the design and execution of humanitarian activities in the field.

back to activity

VEHA - Field Implementation Guidance

Welcome
Nutrition
Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies
Support for appropriate IYCF in Emergencies
Meet the nutritional needs of non- breastfeeding infants less than 6 months old

Meet the nutritional needs of non- breastfeeding infants less than 6 months old

Context

Overview
Environmental factors causing/contributing to the needs and affecting the humanitarian activity

Infants less than six months of age who are not breastfed need urgent identification and targeted skilled support. The priority to feed these infants should be re-lactation. If this is not possible or when artificial feeding is recommended by skilled staff such as health providers or infant feeding counselors, breast-milk substitutes are necessary and must be accompanied by training on hygiene, preparation, and use to minimise their associated risks. Artificial feeding in an emergency carries high risks of malnutrition, illness, and death and is the last resort only when other safer options have first been fully explored.

Infant formula requires mass production by the dairy industry. As well as contributing to malnutrition and sickness in children, it leads to significant environmental impacts including plastic and other waste, and degradation of land and waterways. Pollution and environmental degradation intensify environmental health risks and create harmful living conditions. Pollution of the water, soil, and the air is a threat to human health and wellbeing and exacerbates poverty and inequality.

Pollution also affects animals and plants, thus degrading natural ecosystems and their ability to provide essential natural services and resources for society. The economic burden of pollution is significant, and the cost of rehabilitation of degraded environments is often prohibitive or fails.

Donations of BMS and commercially prepared baby food, etc. are generally very large scale donations (many tonnes) that are not appropriate and are not usable. These donations often come from middle-high income countries into low-income countries greatly overburdening the already stressed waste management infrastructure. Donations should always be denied and/or returned if possible.

Implications
Gender, age, disability and HIV/AIDS implications

Women are usually responsible for feeding children and often also have the least control over household finances.

Impacts

Environmental Impact Categories

Air pollution
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Cultural acceptance
Impact on wellbeing / mental health
Water depletion

Summary of Impacts
Summary of Potential environmental impacts
  • Water sources and soil can be polluted by an accumulation of waste and leachates and spillages from piled wasted items. Piled waste often hosts disease vectors.
  • Accumulation of packaging may result in blockage of drainage channels and watercourses and contamination of waters sources and end up in rivers, lakes, and the ocean.
  • Air may be polluted by burning solid waste.
  • Artificial feeding has high risks of malnutrition, illness, and death, and also spreads sickness through the environment.
  • Pollution also affects animals and plants, degrading natural ecosystems and their ability to provide essential natural services and resources for society.
  • Donations of BMS overwhelm waste management infrastructure.
Impact detail
Detailed potential environmental impact information
  • Procurement and distribution of nutritional items can have negative effects on the environment if activities are not well planned or the needs and behaviour of individuals and communities are not appropriately assessed. When delivered items do not match with the cultural particularities of affected communities, items may be unused and may be piled. Also, when items are used but the resulting waste is not properly managed by people accumulation of wastes can occur in places that have limited recycling capabilities and wasted items can be eliminated by open burning caused air pollution. Improper disposal and management of breastmilk substitute wastes can become a vector for disease to spread within communities. For example, ready-to-use infant formula in liquid form will have individual packaging, thus, increasing the amount of waste per user.
  • Accumulation of packaging may result in blockage of drainage channels and watercourses and contamination of waters sources and end up in rivers, lakes, and the ocean.
  • Pollution and environmental degradation intensify environmental health risks and create harmful living conditions. Pollution of the water, soil, and air is a threat to human health and wellbeing and exacerbates poverty and inequality. Pollution also affects animals and plants, thus degrading natural ecosystems and their ability to provide essential natural services and resources for society. The economic burden of pollution is significant, and the cost of rehabilitation of degraded environments is often prohibitive
  • Breastmilk substitutes require energy for manufacturing, materials for packaging, fuel for distribution and water, and toxic cleaning agents for daily preparation—all of which pollute the air, contaminate oceans and generate billions of tons of plastic and metal waste that ends up in landfills.

Guidance

Summary
Summary of environmental activities
  • Refuse or return any donations of BMS.
  • Support mothers to start or return to breastfeeding wherever possible.
  • Bottles and teats should NEVER be used in a humanitarian emergency.
  • Create plans for appropriate disposal, having the person who receives any BMS return the empty tin to the distribution point before collecting the next tin (this is recommended anyway to prevent misuse or selling of the product and to understand the use of the product in the home).
Detail
  • Refuse to accept any donations of BMS and return any that are delivered to the country of origin, they are unsafe to use and cannot be disposed of effectively in low-income countries.
  • Support mothers to start or return to breastfeeding wherever possible.
  • Bottles and teats should NEVER be used in a humanitarian emergency regardless of whether they can be sterilized. Cups without lids (not sippy cups) can be used and recommended. Cups, however, are recommended over bottles and can be re-used rather than handing out disposable medicine cups, for example. Cups can be used from newborns, bottles are never necessary or recommended. Any bottles that are donated or confiscated should be returned, recycled, or buried to ensure they cannot be used. If a reusable cup is used for a child, which is possible, then this can be used for the child for the length of time that the child needs it, even after the age of five years old. It can then also be used by others in the family.
  • When, as a last resort, identifying and selecting breastmilk substitutes, procure options with safe but low amounts of packaging that protects the items from external contaminants. Search for biodegradable packaging options that can be safely and easily disposed of after use or that are made from sustainable sources or using sustainable processes. However, while biodegradable materials avoid the risk of persistence that plastics present, the industry for effectively handling and composting these materials is not universally available and may not be cost-effective. In addition, biodegradable materials may not meet the durability standards required for certain types of assistance.
  • The procurement and preparation of items can often be designed to reduce packaging or to substitute with packaging that is more environmentally friendly or reusable. Finally, repurpose items that are shipped for the operations, for example, using bags to grow plants and using disappearing ink if branding is an issue. Reusing and repurposing can both reduce waste and create real value for beneficiaries of humanitarian assistance
Lessons Learnt
Lessons from past experiences

In South Sudan, Humanitarian agencies provided nutritional supplement feeding and found that over time waste was accumulating on land and in watercourses, causing pollution. Agencies responded by setting up feeding centers and removing packaging prior to distribution where possible; providing safe comfortable feeding areas and encouraging their use, followed by encouragement to return all waste packaging prior to leaving the feeding center.

Activity Measurement
Environmental indicators/monitoring examples
  • Number of BMS containers appropriately destroyed
  • Number of BMS containers distributed
  • Number of positive changes made to procurement processes to minimise their environmental impact.
Priority
Activity Status
High
Main Focus
Focus of suggested activities
  • Prevention of environmental damage
  • Mitigation of environmental damage
Implications
Resource implications (physical assets, time, effort)

Time for assessment, support provision and management of donations.

Back
to top
icon-menu icon-close icon-account icon-arrow icon-down icon-back icon-pointed-arrow icon-left icon-up icon-bookmark icon-share twitter facebook2 printer envelope icon-close-alt icon-top icon-loading icons / login