VEHA

VEHA

Guidance

Virtual Environmental and Humanitarian Adviser Tool – (VEHA Tool) is a tool
to easily integrate environmental considerations in humanitarian response. Field Implementation guidances are useful for the design and execution of humanitarian activities in the field.

back to activity

VEHA - Field Implementation Guidance

Welcome
Livelihoods
Agricultural livelihoods
Provisioning livelihoods
Management of storage facilities

Management of storage facilities

Context

Overview
Environmental factors causing/contributing to the needs and affecting the humanitarian activity

Poor crop and seed storage increase the risk of losing harvests.

Pesticides and similar chemicals pose a human and environmental health risk. The risk of pests can be reduced through secure agricultural livelihoods storage facilities that prevent pest entry, as well as introducing balanced levels of natural predators and some plants such as neem deter some pests. Governments often have strict requirements pertaining to pesticide usage. Pesticides are controlled substances and should be properly stored for security and safety reasons.

Implications
Gender, age, disability and HIV/AIDS implications

Assistance with food storage is better given to both farmers and retailers and they should be encouraged to pass this knowledge on to others.

In many livelihoods activities helping the second most vulnerable helps the most people through helping markets recover which helps the most vulnerable, many of whom are forced to get food from markets as they’re not able to produce for themselves.

Individuals who may require assistance with food storage and processing are young children, older people, people with disabilities, and people living with HIV.

Impacts

Environmental impact categories

Air pollution
Soil pollution
Water pollution

Summary of Impacts
Summary of potential environmental impacts

Poor quality storage could be defined as open to damp, insects, fungi, rodents, stored for too long, damaged by being squashed, rotting, and being lost in transport to market.

Air, soil, and water pollution can occur from overuse of chemicals and pesticides as well as from gas and food waste (if not properly stored)

Impact detail
Detailed potential environmental impact information

Poor quality storage could be defined as open to damp, insects, fungi, rodents, stored for too long, damaged by being squashed, rotting, and being lost in transport to market.

The environment can be polluted by effluents from agricultural wash off of fertilisers and pesticides, and effluent from rotting seeds and crops. Chemical pesticides can also pollute the environment causing air, soil, and water pollution. Perishing crops can lead to disease spread.

Wasting perishable resources. Littering if food is not well managed.

Guidance

Summary
Summary of environmental activities

Create seed and grain stores that are protected from damp and prevent rodent and insect access.

Transport crops in ways that minimise damage and loss such as using containers, tarpaulins, straw.

Introduce natural predators to crop insect and rodent pests.

Minimise the use of chemical pesticides. Look for organic natural alternatives – consult communities about traditional organic pesticides. A COSHH (Control of Substances Hazardous to Health) or similar assessment should be considered for pesticide usage.

Use recommendations from pest/livestock disease research, including research aiming to reduce pesticide use or plant-incorporated protectants

Use certified fumigation company, approved fumigants, reprocess fumigated products and keep fumigations’ records

Research pest and disease resilient crops.

Detail
Detailed guidance for implementing suggested environmental activities

Work with the community to design seed and grain stores that are protected from damp and prevent rodent and insect access. Support communities in developing or accessing crop insurance and seed banks and alternative livelihoods so they spread their risk. Storage areas should be dry and hygienic, adequately protected from weather, and free of chemical or other contamination.

Refer to https://foodqualityandsafety.wfp.org/pest-management

Support farmers in collaboratively hiring harvesting equipment and transport that will speed up access to markets and reduce the risk of crop loss or spoilage.

Research historical indigenous natural predators to crop insect and rodent pests. Minimise the use of chemical pesticides. Look for organic natural alternatives – consult communities about traditional organic pesticides. A COSHH (Control of Substances Hazardous to Health) or similar assessment should be considered for pesticide usage. Use recommendations from pest/livestock disease research, including research aiming to reduce pesticide use or plant-incorporated protectants

Use certified fumigation company, approved fumigants, reprocess fumigated products and keep fumigations’ records.

Consider introducing improved crop varieties, livestock or fish-stock species, new tools, fertilisers, or innovative management practices. Strengthen food production based on the maintenance of pre-crisis patterns and/or links with national development plans. However, the use of fertilisers is expensive, used excessively, and harmful. Locally developed organic composts as fertilizers is the most recommended approach.

Producers and local consumers must understand and accept the implications of new technologies for local production systems, cultural practices, and the natural environment before adopting them. When introducing new technologies, provide appropriate community consultations, information, and training. If possible, coordinate with livelihood experts and government ministries. Ensure ongoing technological support, future access to the technology, and assess its commercial viability.

Lessons Learnt
Lessons from past experiences

Third-party monitoring has demonstrated that food security is often exacerbated by poor crop and seed storage leading to the deterioration from pests and water damage. Pests can be reduced by constructing secure food storage facilities alongside natural predators and deterrents.

Fumigation could have a negative impact on health (if habitations are within 100m from the storage space/copper exposed to gas); be dangerous if liquid water is coming into direct contact with phosphide tablets, if temperature is below 15°C if it is windy…)

Activity Measurement
Environmental indicators/monitoring examples

Storage identification integrating environment analysis.

Priority
Activity Status
Low
Main Focus
Focus of suggested activities

Prevention of environmental damage

Implications
Resource implications (physical assets, time, effort)

Identify the right storage solution, implies time to evaluate storage requirements. Identify possible solutions to keep them safe.

Planning is required to find sustainable/low cost/adaptable solutions to reduce any potential environmental impact

Back
to top
icon-menu icon-close icon-account icon-arrow icon-down icon-back icon-pointed-arrow icon-left icon-up icon-bookmark icon-share twitter facebook2 printer envelope icon-close-alt icon-top icon-loading icons / login