VEHA

VEHA

Guidance

Virtual Environmental and Humanitarian Adviser Tool – (VEHA Tool) is a tool
to easily integrate environmental considerations in humanitarian response. Field Implementation guidances are useful for the design and execution of humanitarian activities in the field.

back to activity

VEHA - Field Implementation Guidance

Welcome
Livelihoods
Non-agricultural livelihoods
Protecting livelihoods
Social safety nets

Social safety nets

Context

Overview
Environmental factors causing/contributing to the needs and affecting the humanitarian activity

Social safety nets such as welfare systems, pensions, cash and food entitlements, school feeding programmes, free or subsidised access to health services, and agricultural insurance schemes, help protect people from extreme poverty, which in turn protect them from resorting to environmentally damaging coping mechanisms such as unsustainable abstraction of natural resources for sale for survival income.

Implications
Gender, age, disability and HIV/AIDS implications

Women, children, the elderly, the disabled, and people living with chronic health conditions are most in need of social safety nets as they have the least capacity to build their own sustainable livelihoods.

Impacts

Environmental impact categories

Air pollution
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Deforestation
Desertification
Loss of biodiversity and ecosystems
Natural Resource Depletion
Soil erosion

Summary of Impacts
Summary of potential environmental impacts

The provision of social safety nets supports people so they are not forced into environmentally damaging coping mechanisms such as unsustainable abstraction of natural resources for sale for survival income.

Potential increase or decrease in tree cutting; charcoal making; foraging/hunting for wildlife; damage to ecosystems; sanitary hygiene practices and disease spread.

Impact detail
Detailed potential environmental impact information

People who are already living on the edge of poverty who are hit by a humanitarian crisis are very vulnerable to falling into extreme poverty, hunger, and sickness.

The provision of social safety nets such as entitlement to benefits; access to institutional feeding programes; livelihood insurance schemes; access to emergency medical treatment; can protect them from the worst impacts. Such social safety nets can also protect people from feeling forced into environmentally damaging coping mechanisms such as unsustainable abstraction of natural resources for sale for survival income. Provision or absence of social safety nets are likely to lead to a decrease or increase in tree cutting; peat cutting; charcoal making; foraging/hunting for wildlife; dredging of gravel and excavating clay for construction materials; damage to ecosystems; (in)sanitary hygiene practices and disease spread.

Guidance

Summary
Summary of environmental activities

Provide emergency cash and voucher assistance or NFIs, food assistance, health care, livelihoods support whilst developing or advocating for the establishment of effective social safety nets.

Detail
Detailed guidance for implementing suggested environmental activities

Where social safety nets are not present or insufficient, support affected populations hit by humanitarian crisis with emergency cash and voucher assistance; NFI assistance such as blankets, cooking equipment, emergency shelter materials; provide emergency food assistance, health care, and livelihoods support.

In parallel to providing emergency assistance develop or advocate for the establishment of effective social safety nets.

Safety nets could be very locally developed such as community savings and loans schemes for health emergencies or school fees; access to commercial or community-based crop or other livelihood insurance schemes; provision of seed and grain banks; self-help groups; or information campaigns on accessing existing rights such as rights to childcare, schooling provision, pensions or food assistance.

Lessons Learnt
Lessons from past experiences

Agencies working in northern Myanmar demonstrated that establishing social safety nets such as village crop insurance schemes, village-level health emergency funds, saves lives and significantly reduces unsustainable environmental coping mechanisms.

Activity Measurement
Environmental indicators/monitoring examples

Number of communities where social safety nets have been effectively established that protect the most vulnerable from resorting to environmentally harmful coping mechanisms.

Priority
Activity Status
High
Main Focus
Focus of suggested activities

Prevention of environmental damage

Mitigation of environmental damage

Implications
Resource implications (physical assets, time, effort)

Standard humanitarian assistance activities to assess needs for food, water, cash, NFIs, shelter, etc.

Significant additional time and resources to advocate or develop local social safety nets.

Next guidance:

Solid waste management
Back
to top
icon-menu icon-close icon-account icon-arrow icon-down icon-back icon-pointed-arrow icon-left icon-up icon-bookmark icon-share twitter facebook2 printer envelope icon-close-alt icon-top icon-loading icons / login