Recovery
Addressing environmental issues in emergency recovery
Addressing environmental issues in emergency recovery
Integrating environment from the onset of early recovery efforts helps to restore societal functions, livelihoods and areas in a more environmentally and socially responsible way. If undertaken with environmental sustainability in mind, recovery and reconstruction can be utilized to reduce disaster risk and vulnerability to future hazards, and climate change adaptation. An early recovery process also provides a good opportunity to address the environmental impacts of humanitarian response operations, which helps to ensure that both communities and the environment can recover in a healthy, secure and sustainable way.
Typical recovery activities, such as restoring livelihoods can have more substantial environmental impacts. The key areas in which (early) recovery and reconstruction activities should take the environment into account include construction, agriculture, shelter and settlements, debris management (including reuse, recycling, repurposing and reducing), water use, sanitation, energy consumption, camps and other formal and informal settlements and living arrangements, transportation, and (green) procurement. Bringing livelihood, environmental management and disaster risk reduction concerns together in an integrated planning approach contributes to the sustainable development of communities and works to bridge the humanitarian development divide.
In protracted crises, there is often a prolonged period of response, with recurring relapses into crisis and a complicated route to recovery. The resilience approach considers ways in which communities and systems can be strengthened to plan and prepare for risks, cope with crisis and continuously adapt. Here, environment and climate risk considerations are also intrinsically linked.
A situation analysis following a crisis typically looks at key crisis drivers, affected areas, the number and type of affected people, the ways in which people are affected, the most urgent needs and available capacities.
Assessing the environmental consequences of an emergency and prioritizing the response actions based on the needs, forms the foundation of a coherent, efficient and sustainable humanitarian response.
Environment is included into response plans in order to improve programme quality and accountability to disaster-affected people.
Environmental mainstreaming is dependent on successful resource mobilization, where environmental concerns must be integrated in funding proposals in order to secure funding.
Successful integration of environment into the implementation of humanitarian response requires that environment be included into preparedness and planning phases, but also effective coordination with national actors.