VEHA

VEHA

Guidance

Virtual Environmental and Humanitarian Adviser Tool – (VEHA Tool) is a tool
to easily integrate environmental considerations in humanitarian response. Field Implementation guidances are useful for the design and execution of humanitarian activities in the field.

back to activity

VEHA - Field Implementation Guidance

Welcome
Nutrition
Management of wasting
Management of acute malnutrition
Prevention of acute malnutrition through blanket supplementary feeding (where applicable)

Prevention of acute malnutrition through blanket supplementary feeding (where applicable)

Context

Overview
Environmental factors causing/contributing to the needs and affecting the humanitarian activity

Food production depends on the availability of natural resources and specific conditions such as climate and nutrients. Food availability can be impacted due to environmental degradation, changes in climate patterns, overuse of productive land, among others. In addition, when there are disasters and cropland is impacted, humanitarian needs regarding food are at a peak, or when coping strategies affect natural resources, food production can be diminished and increase the likelihood of an increase in malnutrition.

Food security and health impacts include increased malnutrition. Ability to utilize food might decrease where changes in climate are linked to increased disease spread. Climate change might impact food safety due to changes in pests and water pollution.

There is therefore a need to ensure blanket supplementary feeding is available where needed. Blanket assistance is faster and easier to implement and can reduce conflict within assisted populations. However, it reduces the capacity to reach more vulnerable people in other locations. Both approaches will have a different environmental impact which should be considered.

There can be many causes of malnutrition. However, all of them impact the environment and most of them are linked to environmental fragilities.

Implications
Gender, age, disability and HIV/AIDS implications

Reduced presence of waste in target communities suggested a reduced incidence of vector-borne disease associated with that waste. People with chronic health conditions such as HIV/AIDS, people with disabilities, the elderly, and the very young may be more susceptible to such diseases.

Impacts

Environmental Impact Categories

Air pollution
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Deforestation
Desertification

Eutrophication
Climate change
Loss of biodiversity and ecosystems
Natural resource depletion
Soil erosion
Noise pollution
Cultural acceptance
Impact on wellbeing / mental health
Increased drought/flood

Summary of Impacts
Summary of Potential environmental impacts
  • Provision and use of blanket supplementary feeding, can harm the environment or expose affected people to environmental risks, which can ultimately drive further subsequent malnutrition.
  • Air, water, and soil pollution can be caused by the accumulation of waste and spills from piled wasted items. Waste can be caused by the provision of items that are unfamiliar or unwanted. Accumulation of packaging may result in contamination of waters sources and end up in rivers, lakes, and the ocean. This can lead to disease spread and cause harm to flora, fauna, and ecosystems.
  • Provision of blanket supplementary feeding can cause local or displaced unsustainable use of natural resources and unsustainable transport and logistics practices.
Impact detail
Detailed potential environmental impact information
  • The main environmental impact of prevention of acute malnutrition through blanket supplementary feeding will result from the RUSF packaging. Most of the related interventions will require RUSF and in most cases (more than 90% of the time), RUSF has foiled packaging. Managing this waste is, therefore, a priority to limit environmental impact.
  • The distribution of supplementary feeding items can have negative effects on the environment, or expose affected people to environmental risks if activities are not well planned or the needs and behaviour of individuals and communities are not appropriately assessed. This can ultimately drive further subsequent malnutrition. When delivered items do not match with the cultural preferences of affected communities, items may be unused and may be discarded. Also, when items are used but the resulting waste is not properly managed by people accumulation of waste can occur in places that have limited waste management and recycling capabilities and wasted items can be disposed of by open burning, causing air pollution. Improper disposal and management of nutritional wastes can become a vector for disease to spread within communities.
  • In addition, if foodstuffs provided for supplementary feeding require long periods of boiling or cooking, there will be an increase in fuel consumption and potentially deforestation, as well as associated protection risks with gathering fuel – although this depends on local conditions and types of fuel source.
  • Air, water, and soil pollution can be caused by the accumulation of waste and spills from piled wasted items. Waste can be caused by the provision of items that are unfamiliar or unwanted. Accumulation of packaging may result in contamination of waters sources and end up in rivers, lakes, and the ocean. This can lead to disease spread and cause harm to flora, fauna, and ecosystems.
  • Provision of blanket supplementary feeding can cause local or displaced unsustainable use of natural resources and unsustainable transport and logistics practices.

Guidance

Summary
Summary of environmental activities
  • Blanket supplementary feeding programmes should use reusable containers wherever possible. If they can only be single use, establish a plan for proper disposal and aim for recyclable packaging options where circumstances permit, or else ensure that the packaging is collected after the food has been used and taken to the nearest city where appropriate disposal facilities exist.
  • Use quick-cook varieties of food to minimise fuel use and fuel gathering.
  • While addressing the key issues associated with nutrition and good practices in nutrition, providing health advice on how the environmental determinants of health influence nutrition may also help people to address the factors that contribute to co-morbidities and compromised nutritional status.
Detail
Detailed guidance for implementing suggested environmental activities
  • Assess community capacities to determine whether to provide wet or dry rations. Adapt nutritional packs to meet the actual needs to avoid waste. Assess household cooking facilities to inform decisions on the provision of pre-cooked, or raw ingredients.
  • Consider cultural acceptance, ease of storage, and familiarity of processing, as well as cooking and serving methods. Look at the potential for supplementary feeding item provision through local markets and explore the potential for Cash and Voucher programming.
  • Assess items to be procured; sources and opportunities to reduce environmental impact and identify the nearest sustainable sources of products with long shelf-lives. Store products to minimise the risk of deterioration.
  • When the supplements come in powder, dry pills or as tablets, or as liquids, including oils, refill stations should be introduced when feasible, with appropriate awareness-raising on food hygiene and safety. Investigate the option of introducing refill stations where people can access periodic refill of products using the original distributed containers.
  • When identifying and selecting items to procure, choose options with safe but low amounts of packaging that protect the items from external contaminants whilst packaging various components of a set as one unit versus individual units.
  • Provide opportunities for people to hand back unwanted items. If supplements are to be taken home by beneficiaries, encourage beneficiaries to bring empty packaging back when they receive their next batch of supplements, to allow for the distributing agency to take charge of waste management and reduce open littering. Generally, the packaging of specialised foods and supplements cannot be recycled. If beneficiaries will not return for future consultations, provide advice on how to dispose of the packaging, including recycling options where these exist. If possible, try to tender for supplements that come in biodegradable or compostable packages, if these are available in the local market.
  • Search for biodegradable options that can be safely and easily disposed of after use, or that are made from sustainable sources or using sustainable processes. However, while biodegradable materials avoid the risk of persistence that plastics present, the industry for effectively handling and composting these materials is not universally available and may not be cost-effective. In addition, biodegradable materials may not meet the durability standards required for certain types of assistance.
  • The procurement and preparation of items can often be designed to reduce packaging or to substitute with packaging that is more environmentally friendly or reusable. Repurpose items that are shipped for the operations, for example, using bags to grow plants and using disappearing ink if branding is an issue. Reusing and repurposing can both reduce waste and create real value for beneficiaries of humanitarian assistance.
Lessons Learnt
Lessons from past experiences

In South Sudan, Humanitarian agencies provided nutritional supplement feeding and found that over time waste was accumulating on land and in watercourses, causing pollution. Agencies responded by setting up feeding centers and removing packaging prior to distribution where possible; providing safe comfortable feeding areas and encouraging their use, followed by encouragement to return all waste packaging prior to leaving the feeding center.

Activity Measurement
Environmental indicators/monitoring examples
  • Percentage of people that use reusable containers to refill with supplementary feeding items
  • Amount of supplementary feed options that are delivered using reusable containers
  • Number of positive changes made to procurement processes to minimise environmental impact.
Priority
Activity Status
Medium
Main Focus
Focus of suggested activities

Prevention of environmental damage

Implications
Resource implications (physical assets, time, effort)

Additional time to create a scheme for reuse/refill/repurpose/safe disposal of items and for the refill stations, the appropriate equipment. An additional visit to gather up and remove the packaging or other wastes (although this can be combined with post-distribution monitoring).

Back
to top
icon-menu icon-close icon-account icon-arrow icon-down icon-back icon-pointed-arrow icon-left icon-up icon-bookmark icon-share twitter facebook2 printer envelope icon-close-alt icon-top icon-loading icons / login